What it is
FocusedFocused: validation depth + verifiable proof
→ One job done deeply, not six done at the surface.
All-in-one: validation + plan + brand + logo + ads
IdeaProof tries everything. Masters none.
IdeaProof validates ideas, then piles on brand, logo, and ad tools, and links no claim to a source. Preuve AI does one job: it scans 50+ live sources and ties every claim to its origin.
Side by side
Verdict
Preuve AI wins 10 of 11 validation steps.
IdeaProof ships a static PDF. Preuve ships sourced, verifiable evidence.
What it is
FocusedFocused: validation depth + verifiable proof
→ One job done deeply, not six done at the surface.
All-in-one: validation + plan + brand + logo + ads
Live data vs trained data, the upstream problem.
Data source
Live50+ live sources (Crunchbase, Trends, Reddit, PH, G2)
→ You see what the market looks like today, not a model best guess.
LLM inference, no external sources named
Source links
VerifiableEvery claim links to its origin
→ Every number is a clickable URL you can verify yourself.
No source links
Competitor data
Real-timeLive data with funding, pricing, traction
→ Real competitors with real rounds, not a list invented by a model.
Generated list, no source links
Sourced numbers, repeatable verdict, structured report.
Market sizing
SourcedBottom-up TAM/SAM/SOM with sources
→ A TAM you can defend, because every input has a link behind it.
Included, methodology unclear
Scoring
Honest6 frameworks, median 55, every input linked to verify
→ Pass rate 18.3%. A score has to mean something.
Claims "89% accuracy" with no methodology or benchmark
Consistency
ReproducibleVerified across multiple runs, auto-reruns on disagreement
→ Re-run the same idea, get the same verdict.
Single AI run, score can drift on re-run
Pivot recommendations
Actionable3 pivots based on competitive gaps + market signals
→ When the verdict is "no," you still walk away with directions worth testing.
Not available
Report format
Structured13-section interactive dashboard + shareable link
→ Share a dashboard, not a 20-page PDF.
PDF export
One-time pay vs subscription, and who it is for.
Cost
Transparent$29 one-time per report
→ $29 means $29. No credits to decode, no math to work backward.
Credit packs (EUR 19.99-99.99), cost per report unclear
Best for
Validating with sourced evidence
Bundled validation + branding workflow
What it is
Focused: validation depth + verifiable proof
→ One job done deeply, not six done at the surface.
All-in-one: validation + plan + brand + logo + ads
Live data vs trained data, the upstream problem.
Data source
50+ live sources (Crunchbase, Trends, Reddit, PH, G2)
→ You see what the market looks like today, not a model best guess.
LLM inference, no external sources named
Source links
Every claim links to its origin
→ Every number is a clickable URL you can verify yourself.
No source links
Competitor data
Live data with funding, pricing, traction
→ Real competitors with real rounds, not a list invented by a model.
Generated list, no source links
Sourced numbers, repeatable verdict, structured report.
Market sizing
Bottom-up TAM/SAM/SOM with sources
→ A TAM you can defend, because every input has a link behind it.
Included, methodology unclear
Scoring
6 frameworks, median 55, every input linked to verify
→ Pass rate 18.3%. A score has to mean something.
Claims "89% accuracy" with no methodology or benchmark
Consistency
Verified across multiple runs, auto-reruns on disagreement
→ Re-run the same idea, get the same verdict.
Single AI run, score can drift on re-run
Pivot recommendations
3 pivots based on competitive gaps + market signals
→ When the verdict is "no," you still walk away with directions worth testing.
Not available
Report format
13-section interactive dashboard + shareable link
→ Share a dashboard, not a 20-page PDF.
PDF export
One-time pay vs subscription, and who it is for.
Cost
$29 one-time per report
→ $29 means $29. No credits to decode, no math to work backward.
Credit packs (EUR 19.99-99.99), cost per report unclear
Best for
Validating with sourced evidence
Bundled validation + branding workflow
The core difference
The real test
A validator that tells every founder their idea is great is not validating anything, just flattering them.
~55
median score
6 scoring frameworks against 50+ live sources. Only 18.3% of ideas earn a go verdict. If your idea scores well, it earned it.
~78
average score
AI-generated analysis with no live data to disagree with. High scores feel good but don't mean much.
A low score points to specific problems, most of them fixable. The gap between a 48 and a 72 is usually 2-3 things you can address.
Fair assessment
IdeaProof has strengths worth acknowledging.
One place for validation, market analysis, a business plan, brand strategy, an AI logo, and ad creatives. If you want a bundle, the bundle is real.
Generates a logo, visual identity, and ad creatives for Meta, Google, and TikTok at the Builder and Founder packs. Useful if you need early branding fast.
Pricing is one-time credit packs (EUR 19.99 to 99.99) and their site states purchased credits never expire. No recurring monthly bill.
50+ sources searched in real-time, not from training data. Crunchbase, Google Trends, Reddit, Product Hunt, G2, and more.
Click any data point to see its source. No trust required. Every competitor, funding round, and demand signal links back to where we found it.
We tell founders when their idea needs work. Only 18.3% of ideas earn a go verdict. Six scoring frameworks run against live data, so the score reflects what the market says, not what sounds good.
$499 package with pitch deck, investment memo, 18-month financial model, and competitive teardown. Built for due diligence, not just brainstorming.
Shareable link with 13 interactive sections. Filter competitors, drill into market data, and share specific sections with co-founders or investors.
Real competitors with real funding data, real pricing, and real traction. Not a list of names from an LLM's training data.
Defendable 4-6 page Business Plan PDF, bank-ready. Auto-filled from your analysis, share with your cofounder or team in one click.
Verdict in one minute
IdeaProof stretches across validation, branding, logos, and ad creatives. That breadth is the pitch, but a tool doing six jobs rarely goes as deep on any one as a tool built for a single decision. It works best when bundled brand assets matter more than proof. Preuve AI is the better call once you need validation that holds up when a real decision rides on it.
Verify everything
“89% accuracy · verified with 10,000+ users”
This sits on their homepage and repeats across the site (“89% accuracy · 50+ criteria · Real-time data · 2026 refresh”). We looked for the methodology behind the number. No benchmark dataset, no study, no definition of what “accuracy” means for a startup prediction. If a founder put an unverifiable accuracy stat in a pitch deck, investors would flag it.
“Real-time data · 50+ authoritative sources”
Their site markets “real-time data” and “50+ authoritative sources,” but names none of them and links none of them. The output reads like LLM inference, and there is no clickable trail from any claim to where it came from. Real-time data you cannot inspect is a label, not a source.
“$2.3M+ raised · 156+ launches · 67% better pitches”
Their homepage cites “$2.3M+ in funding raised,” “156+ successful business launches,” and a “67% improvement in pitch success rates.” None of these come with a sample size, time window, or attribution showing the tool caused the outcome. Round numbers without a method behind them are marketing copy.
“10,000+ verified entrepreneurs”
IdeaProof went from “2,800+ founders” on Product Hunt (June 2025) to “10,000+ verified entrepreneurs” on their homepage (June 2026). We checked third-party review platforms: 0 reviews on Trustpilot, 0 on G2, 0 on Capterra, and 3 on Product Hunt, each from a single-review account. A user count with no independent reviews behind it is a claim, not social proof.
What does one report actually cost?
With IdeaProof you buy credit packs (EUR 19.99 to 99.99) and work backward to the per-report price, and their own free tier is listed as both 70 and 90 credits on different parts of the site. With Preuve AI there is no math: $29 for the report, or run the free scan first.
The challenge
Run the same idea through both tools. Click the links in our report. Then try clicking the claims in theirs.
Test your idea free→Join 100+ entrepreneurs who upgraded
FAQ
IdeaProof claims "89% accuracy verified with 10,000+ users" but doesn't disclose the methodology, benchmark dataset, or definition of "accuracy" for startup validation. There is no industry-standard ground truth to measure against. Preuve AI takes a different approach: instead of claiming a number, every data point links to its source so you can verify accuracy yourself.
Preuve AI pulls from 50+ live sources (Crunchbase, Google Trends, Reddit, Product Hunt, G2) and links every claim to its origin. IdeaProof uses multi-model AI to generate analysis without external data verification. That difference is critical when a real funding decision depends on the numbers.
Yes. Preuve AI offers a free viability scan (score + risks + 2 competitor previews). IdeaProof offers a free tier with 3 validations included (their site lists both 70 and 90 free credits). Try both and compare the outputs.
It depends on what you need. If you want evidence-backed analysis with verifiable source links, Preuve AI is the only tool that delivers this. If you want brand identity and marketing assets bundled with validation, IdeaProof covers that at higher tiers.
As of June 2026, IdeaProof's top pack (Founder, EUR 99.99 one-time) generates a business plan, but there is no dedicated done-for-you investor package. Preuve AI offers a $499 Investor Package covering pitch deck, investment memo, 18-month financial model, and competitive teardown.
IdeaProof features and pricing based on ideaproof.io as of June 2026. Features and pricing may have changed. All trademarks belong to their respective owners.