What it is
FocusedFocused: validation depth + verifiable proof
→ One job done deeply, not six done at the surface.
All-in-one: validation + plan + brand + logo + ads
IdeaProof tries everything. Masters none.
IdeaProof tries to validate ideas, then piles on brand, logo, and ad tools, citing barely any sources. Preuve AI does one job: it scans 60+ live sources and ties every claim to its origin.
Side by side
Verdict
Preuve AI wins 10 of 11 validation steps.
IdeaProof cites a handful of sources. Preuve links every claim to one of 60+.
What it is
FocusedFocused: validation depth + verifiable proof
→ One job done deeply, not six done at the surface.
All-in-one: validation + plan + brand + logo + ads
Live data vs trained data, the upstream problem.
Data source
Live60+ live sources (Crunchbase, Trends, Reddit, PH, G2)
→ You see what the market looks like today, not a model best guess.
4-model LLM ensemble from 2025, ~5 sources cited per report
Source links
VerifiableEvery claim links to its origin
→ Every number is a clickable URL you can verify yourself.
A few inline citations, most claims unlinked
Competitor data
Real-timeLive data with funding, pricing, traction
→ Real competitors with real rounds, not a list invented by a model.
Generated teardown, sources not linked per claim
Sourced numbers, repeatable verdict, structured report.
Market sizing
SourcedBottom-up TAM/SAM/SOM with sources
→ A TAM you can defend, because every input has a link behind it.
Included, methodology unclear
Scoring
Honest6 frameworks, median 54, every input linked to verify
→ Pass rate 17.5%. A score has to mean something.
Claims "89% accuracy", backed by 12-month stats, launched Jan 2026
Consistency
ReproducibleVerified across multiple runs, auto-reruns on disagreement
→ Re-run the same idea, get the same verdict.
Multi-model, but no published consistency check
Pivot recommendations
Actionable3 pivots based on competitive gaps + market signals
→ When the verdict is "no," you still walk away with directions worth testing.
None, no pivot suggestions in the report
Report format
Structured18-section interactive dashboard + shareable link + AI export
→ Share a dashboard, export your report as AI context, not a 20-page PDF.
6-section report + PDF export
One-time pay vs subscription, and who it is for.
Cost
Transparent$29 one-time per report
→ No credits to decode, no math to work backward, simple & clear.
Credit packs (EUR 19.99-99.99); a full journey runs ~690 credits
Best for
Validating with sourced evidence
Bundled validation + branding workflow
The core difference
The real test
A validator that tells every founder their idea is great is not validating anything, just flattering them.
54
median score
6 scoring frameworks against 60+ live sources. Only 17.5% of ideas earn a go verdict. If your idea scores well, it earned it.
~78
average score
AI-generated analysis with no live data to disagree with. High scores feel good but don't mean much.
A low score points to specific problems, most of them fixable. The gap between a 48 and a 72 is usually 2-3 things you can address.
Fair assessment
IdeaProof has strengths worth acknowledging.
One place for validation, market analysis, a business plan, brand strategy, an AI logo, and ad creatives. If you want a bundle, the bundle is real.
Generates a logo, visual identity, and ad creatives for Meta, Google, and TikTok at the Builder and Founder packs. Useful if you need early branding fast.
Pricing is one-time credit packs (EUR 19.99 to 99.99) with no recurring monthly bill. Credits carry a 12-month validity.
60+ sources searched in real-time, not from training data. Crunchbase, Google Trends, Reddit, Product Hunt, G2, and more.
Click any data point to see its source. No trust required. Every competitor, funding round, and demand signal links back to where we found it.
We tell founders when their idea needs work. Only 17.5% of ideas earn a go verdict. Six scoring frameworks run against live data, so the score reflects what the market says, not what sounds good.
$499 package with pitch deck, investment memo, 18-month financial model, and competitive teardown. Built for due diligence, not just brainstorming.
Shareable link with 18 interactive sections. Filter competitors, drill into market data, and share specific sections with co-founders or investors.
Real competitors with real funding data, real pricing, and real traction. Not a list of names from an LLM's training data.
Defendable 4-6 page Business Plan PDF, bank-ready. Auto-filled from your analysis, share with your cofounder or team in one click.
Claims vs receipts
IdeaProof now says what we say, live sources, multiple models, re-runs you can trigger again. Copying the line is easy. Backing it is the part that does not fit in a screenshot.
Their own report footer lists 5 (top method: web search).
A 12-month survival stat, from a product launched on Product Hunt in January 2026.
0 reviews on Trustpilot, G2, and Capterra.
Accurate at 40 credits each, but still 10 short of one Market Analysis.
Credits expire after 12 months, with a Buy-more button inside the report.
Anyone can copy the words. We will show you the links: every claim in a Preuve report ties back to one of 60+ live sources.
Verify everything
"12-month survival tracking"
Our finding
IdeaProof publishes this on its research methodology page. The product launched on 28 January 2026. That is six months ago. You cannot track twelve months of anything in six months. The same page says 67% of the ideas it rates highly go on to earn $10,000 a month. It never asks you what you earn. It also says it publishes an accuracy report every three months. There is none. Checked 10 August 2026 at ideaproof.io/research-methodology.
"Real-time data · 60+ authoritative sources"
Our finding
Their site markets "real-time data" and "60+ authoritative sources." The reports now carry a few inline citations, but the report's own footer lists just 5 sources (top method: web search), and the claims that matter, the TAM, the “89% accuracy,” the financials, still link to nothing. A handful of citations is not a sourced report: a Preuve report cites 40+ distinct domains, median 70 clickable links. An unlinked number is not one you can verify.
"$2.3M+ raised · 156+ launches · 67% better pitches"
Our finding
Their homepage cites "$2.3M+ in funding raised," "156+ successful business launches," and a "67% improvement in pitch success rates." None of these come with a sample size, time window, or attribution showing the tool caused the outcome. Round numbers without a method behind them are marketing copy.
"10,000+ verified entrepreneurs"
Our finding
IdeaProof went from "2,800+ founders" on Product Hunt (28 January 2026) to "10,000+ verified entrepreneurs" today. We checked third-party review platforms: 0 reviews on Trustpilot, 0 on G2, 0 on Capterra, and 3 on Product Hunt, each from a single-review account. A 10,000+ count with zero third-party reviews behind it is not social proof, it is highly suspicious. Their own site meanwhile advertises "G2 · 38 reviews", a number their G2 page does not have. See the next card.
"G2 · 38 reviews"
Our finding
This runs on their own site as social proof, next to a Reddit and a Product Hunt count. Their G2 listing is claimed and public, so you can count it yourself: their G2 page shows 0 / 5, with 0 reviews. Not few. Zero. Checked and archived 10 August 2026. We are not asking you to take our word for it, that is the entire point.
Same test on us, because it would be cheap not to run it. Preuve has 13 reviews: 7 on Trustpilot, 3 on TheresAnAIForThat, 1 on Product Hunt and 2 sent to us directly. Three are verified purchases. Each one is named, with its platform, on our reviews page. Count them.
"3.4 / 5 · reviewed by IdeaProof editorial"
Our finding
IdeaProof publishes two different ratings of Preuve AI, on two of its own pages, both live on 10 August 2026. On their roundup of 8 validators we score 4.6, ranked second and labelled "Best for Evidence-Based Validation". On the page written to rank against our name, the same editorial team scores us 3.4. Their own score does not move between the two: 4.9 on both. A validation tool sells one thing, that a score means something. This one moved 1.2 points depending on which page it sat on.
What does one report actually cost?
IdeaProof prices in credits, and the credits hide the real cost. A validation is 40 credits, but the analysis founders actually want, Market Analysis, is 100, and it gates the Business Plan (100), Brand (50), Visual Identity (150) and Ad Campaign (250) behind it. One idea taken end to end runs about 690 credits. The free tier is 90 credits, which their pricing page now describes as two full validations, and which still falls 10 short of unlocking a single Market Analysis. The "EUR 19.99" Starter pack (150 credits) covers one validation plus one Market Analysis, then strands you before the Business Plan. With Preuve AI there is no math: $29 for the full report, or run the free scan first.
Our verdict on IdeaProof
2/ 5
IdeaProof, reviewed by Preuve AI, checked and archived 10 August 2026. The product ships a lot. What pulls the score to 2 is the evidence behind its own claims, every item above verifiable from its own pages. Scale 1 to 5. We are the competitor here, so check the links rather than the number.
Verdict in one minute
IdeaProof stretches across validation, branding, logos, and ad creatives. That breadth is the pitch, but a tool doing six jobs rarely goes as deep on any one as a tool built for a single decision. It works best when bundled brand assets matter more than proof. Preuve AI is the better call once you need validation that holds up when a real decision rides on it.
The challenge
Run the same idea through both tools. Click the links in our report. Then try clicking the claims in theirs.
Test your idea free→Join 169+ entrepreneurs who upgraded
FAQ
IdeaProof advertises "89% prediction accuracy" next to "10,000+ founders". It does publish a research methodology page, so the number is not unexplained. The problem is what that page reports. It gives a 12-month survival rate for the ideas it scored, but IdeaProof launched on Product Hunt on 28 January 2026, six months ago. It says 67% of high-scoring ideas go on to earn $10,000 a month, a revenue figure it never collects. It says it publishes an accuracy report every three months. There is none. Checked 10 August 2026. Preuve AI claims no accuracy number at all: every data point links to its source, so you check it yourself.
Preuve AI pulls from 60+ live sources (Crunchbase, Google Trends, Reddit, Product Hunt, G2) and links every claim to its origin. IdeaProof runs a multi-model setup and cites a few sources, but its own report footer lists just 5 (top method: web search) and leaves most claims unlinked. That difference is critical when a real funding decision depends on the numbers.
Yes. Preuve AI offers a free viability scan (score + risks + 2 competitor previews). IdeaProof gives 90 free credits, which its pricing page now describes as 2 full validations at 40 credits each. The deeper Market Analysis (100 credits) sits just past the free tier. Try both and compare the outputs.
It depends on what you need. If you want evidence-backed analysis with verifiable source links, Preuve AI is the only tool that delivers this. If you want brand identity and marketing assets bundled with validation, IdeaProof covers that at higher tiers.
As of July 2026, IdeaProof's paid tiers generate an investor-ready business plan with financial projections, and a 10-slide investor deck is available as a credit add-on, both AI-generated. What it does not sell is a done-for-you package. Preuve AI's $499 Investor Package is founder-built and reviewed from your own report: pitch deck, investment memo, 18-month financial model, and competitive teardown.
IdeaProof features and pricing based on ideaproof.io as of July 2026. Features and pricing may have changed. All trademarks belong to their respective owners.